gms | German Medical Science

84th Annual Meeting of the German Society of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology, Head and Neck Surgery

German Society of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology, Head and Neck Surgery

08.05. - 12.05.2013, Nürnberg

Article

Send article

Sialendoscopy and sialography in diagnostics of benign salivary obstruction

Meeting Abstract

Search Medline for

  • corresponding author Lucia Stanikova - Department of Otorhinolaryngology, University Hospital Ostrava, Ostrava Poruba, Czech Republic
  • Pavel Strympl - Department of Otorhinolaryngology, University Hospital Ostrava, Ostrava, The Czech Republic
  • Tomas Pniak - Department of Otorhinolaryngology, University Hospital Ostrava, Ostrava, The Czech Republic
  • Petr Matousek - Department of Otorhinolaryngology, University Hospital Ostrava, Ostrava, The Czech Republic
  • Pavel Kominek - Department of Otorhinolaryngology, University Hospital Ostrava, Ostrava, The Czech Republic

Deutsche Gesellschaft für Hals-Nasen-Ohren-Heilkunde, Kopf- und Hals-Chirurgie. 84. Jahresversammlung der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Hals-Nasen-Ohren-Heilkunde, Kopf- und Hals-Chirurgie. Nürnberg, 08.-12.05.2013. Düsseldorf: German Medical Science GMS Publishing House; 2013. Doc13hnod748

doi: 10.3205/13hnod748, urn:nbn:de:0183-13hnod7485

Published: April 15, 2013

© 2013 Stanikova et al.
This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/deed.en). You are free: to Share – to copy, distribute and transmit the work, provided the original author and source are credited.

Outline

Text

Introduction: Benign obstructive disease of salivary gland (SG) ducts is the most common SG disorder. Its diagnostics is based on the patient history and the results of clinical examination, ultrasound and sialendoscopy. The x-ray sialography is currently less commonly used procedure. The aim of the present study was to compare usefulness of sialendoscopy and sialography in the detection of benign salivary obstruction.

Methods: Patients with recurrent SG swelling were included in our study. As a first step, sialography was performed and patients were sorted out into three groups (sialolithiasis, duct stenosis, no pathology). Subsequently, sialendoscopy was performed. The results of two methods were compared.

Results: Twenty-three patients with benign salivary obstruction were included in our study. Using sialography, stenosis, lithiasis and no pathology was detected in 4, 11 and 8 patients, respectively. Using sialendoscopy stenosis, sialolithiasis and no pathology was proved in 7, 11 and 5 patients, respectively. In 16 of 23 patients (70%) sialendoscopic finding was in accordance with sialography imaging. The main difference was found in stenosis of duct system – only 50% of stenoses were detected on conventional sialography. The imaging of salivary stones was more successful. The sialography showed sialolithiasis in 80% cases.

Conclusion: Sialendsocopy is more sensitive than sialography in the detection of the SG duct obstruction patologies. Especially in diagnostics of duct stenosis sialendoscopy is more effective method.

This study was supported by the grant IGA of the Ministry of Health Czech Republic NT/13505.

Supported by: Grant IGA MZ CR NT/13505.

Der Erstautor gibt keinen Interessenkonflikt an.